different lens types and their uses<\/a> is a great start.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nConsid\u00e9rations pratiques : l'exp\u00e9rience au quotidien<\/h2>\n
Technical charts and pixel-peeping are one thing, but how a lens feels in your hands and fits into your workflow is just as important. The differences between the 24-70mm f\/2.8 and the 24-105mm f\/4 become starkly apparent when you move from the spec sheet to the real world. Let’s break down the practical realities of owning and using each of these lenses.<\/p>\n
Taille, Poids et Ergonomie<\/h3>\n
The most immediate and noticeable difference between these two lenses isn’t in the images they produce, but in their physical presence. This is a factor that will influence every single shoot.<\/p>\n
A 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is built around large glass elements needed to gather that extra stop of light. As a result, it is almost universally heavier, longer, and wider in diameter than its f\/4 counterpart. We’re often talking about a weight difference of 200-400 grams (roughly half a pound or more), which might not sound like much, but becomes significant over a long day.<\/p>\nCe volume suppl\u00e9mentaire a un impact direct sur la manipulation. Sur un bo\u00eetier d'appareil photo plus grand et professionnel (comme un Canon 1DX, un Nikon D6, ou un appareil photo sans miroir avec une poign\u00e9e batterie), l'objectif f\/2.8 est \u00e9quilibr\u00e9 et substantiel. Cependant, si vous le montez sur un bo\u00eetier sans miroir plus petit et sans poign\u00e9e, il peut sembler d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibr\u00e9 vers l'avant et difficile \u00e0 manier, exer\u00e7ant une pression accrue sur votre poignet.<\/p>\n
The 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong>, by contrast, is designed with portability in mind. It strikes a much better balance on a wider range of camera bodies, especially the compact mirrorless systems that are now so popular. When it comes to “all-day carry” comfort, the f\/4 is the undisputed champion. If you are a travel photographer, a hiker, or someone who spends eight hours on their feet at an event, the weight savings of the 24-105mm f\/4 can be the difference between an enjoyable day and a fatiguing one.<\/p>\nQualit\u00e9 de fabrication et durabilit\u00e9<\/h3>\n
Both of these lenses typically fall into a manufacturer’s professional or prosumer lineup, meaning you can expect a high standard of construction. However, there are subtle differences in philosophy.<\/p>\n
\n- Materials:<\/strong> The flagship 24-70mm f\/2.8 lenses often feature more metal components in their barrels and internal construction, giving them a dense, premium, “built-like-a-tank” feel. The 24-105mm f\/4 lenses frequently use high-quality, engineering-grade plastics for the outer shell to reduce weight, while still retaining a durable metal lens mount and internal frame. It’s important to note that modern plastics are incredibly tough and are not an indicator of poor quality.<\/li>\n
- Weather Sealing:<\/strong> Professional use demands reliability in adverse conditions. Both lens categories typically offer extensive weather sealing, with rubber gaskets around the lens mount, switches, and rings to protect against dust and moisture. You can generally feel confident using either lens in a light rain shower, though the f\/2.8 models might occasionally boast a slightly more robust implementation.<\/li>\n
- Tactile Feel:<\/strong> The physical experience of using the lens can also differ. The zoom and focus rings on an f\/2.8 lens are often wider and have a more dampened, fluid resistance, which can feel more precise and luxurious. The rings on an f\/4 lens are perfectly functional and smooth but may feel a bit lighter and quicker to turn. This is largely a matter of personal preference.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Le facteur prix<\/h3>\n
Au-del\u00e0 des performances, le facteur d\u00e9cisif le plus important pour de nombreux photographes est le co\u00fbt. Ici, le choix devient tr\u00e8s clair.<\/p>\n
The 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is a flagship, top-tier professional lens, and it carries a price tag to match. New models are consistently among the most expensive standard zooms available, often costing nearly double that of their f\/4 siblings. Even on the used market, a well-maintained f\/2.8 holds its value and represents a substantial investment.<\/p>\nSo, is that performance worth the significant price jump? The answer depends entirely on your needs. For a working professional who shoots weddings in dimly lit churches or corporate events in dark reception halls, the f\/2.8 isn’t a luxury; it’s a necessity that pays for itself by ensuring they can capture clean, sharp images in any lighting. The ability to get “the shot” when money is on the line makes the cost justifiable.<\/p>\n
For most enthusiasts, travelers, and hobbyists, the 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong> offers far more “bang for your buck.” You get a lens with a more versatile zoom range, excellent image quality in good light, professional-grade build, and weather sealing, all for a much more accessible price. The money saved could be put towards another lens (like a fast prime for low light), a new camera body, or a photography trip. In terms of pure value, the 24-105mm f\/4 is incredibly hard to beat.<\/p>\nQuel objectif est le meilleur pour VOUS ? Une ventilation bas\u00e9e sur des sc\u00e9narios<\/h2>\n
Technical charts and pixel-peeping can only tell you so much. The real test of a lens is how it performs in the situations you actually shoot in. Let’s break down which of these workhorses is better suited for different types of photographers and videographers.<\/p>\n
Pour le Photographe de Mariages et \u00c9v\u00e9nements<\/h3>\n
In the fast-paced, unpredictable world of event photography, the 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is widely considered the industry standard, and for good reason. Weddings and corporate events often take place in dimly lit venues like churches, ballrooms, and reception halls where flash is either prohibited or disruptive. The f\/2.8 aperture’s ability to gather a full stop more light than the f\/4 is a game-changer.<\/p>\nCeci se traduit directement par deux avantages critiques :<\/p>\n
\n- Cleaner Images:<\/strong> You can use a lower ISO, resulting in significantly less noise and better color fidelity in your final images.<\/li>\n
- Mouvement gel\u00e9<\/strong> The extra light allows for faster shutter speeds, which are essential for capturing sharp photos of people walking down the aisle, dancing, or giving speeches without motion blur.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Furthermore, the shallower depth of field at f\/2.8 is perfect for isolating subjects\u2014like the happy couple during their first dance\u2014from busy, distracting backgrounds. While the 24-105mm is a capable lens, the f\/2.8 provides a crucial low-light advantage that professionals can’t afford to sacrifice.<\/p>\n
Verdict:<\/strong> The 24-70mm f\/2.8 is the clear winner for its low-light performance and subject separation capabilities, which are paramount in this field.<\/p>\nPour le Photographe Portraitiste (Studio & Environnemental)<\/h3>\n
Cette cat\u00e9gorie pr\u00e9sente un d\u00e9bat fascinant, avec des arguments convaincants pour les deux approches. Le meilleur choix d\u00e9pend fortement de votre style et de votre environnement de prise de vue.<\/p>\n
\n- The case for the 24-70mm f\/2.8:<\/strong> For environmental portraits where the background is part of the story, the f\/2.8 aperture is king. Shooting at 70mm and f\/2.8 creates a beautiful, soft background blur (bokeh) that makes your subject pop in a three-dimensional way. This “look” is highly sought after and helps to create a clear focal point, directing the viewer’s eye exactly where you want it.<\/li>\n
- The case for the 24-105mm f\/4:<\/strong> In a studio with controlled lighting, the f\/4 aperture is rarely a limitation. Here, the extra reach to 105mm becomes a significant advantage. A longer focal length provides more flattering compression for headshots and upper-body portraits, minimizing distortion of facial features. It also allows you to work from a more comfortable distance from your subject. The compression at 105mm can create a very pleasing and classic portrait aesthetic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Verdict:<\/strong> A tie, based on preference. Choose the 24-70mm f\/2.8 for maximum background blur and a modern environmental portrait style. Choose the 24-105mm f\/4 if you value flattering compression and a longer working distance, especially in a studio setting.<\/p>\nPour le photographe de paysage et de voyage<\/h3>\n
For those who spend their days hiking trails or exploring new cities, the 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong> often emerges as the more practical and versatile companion. Landscape photography is typically done at smaller apertures like f\/8 or f\/11 to maximize depth of field, making the f\/2.8’s speed advantage irrelevant for most shots.<\/p>\nLes avantages de l'objectif f\/4 dans ce genre sont clairs :<\/p>\n
\n- Lighter Weight:<\/strong> When you’re carrying your gear all day, every gram counts. The 24-105mm is noticeably lighter and more compact, reducing fatigue.<\/li>\n
- Greater Reach:<\/strong> That extra 35mm of zoom range is incredibly useful. It allows you to isolate distant mountain peaks, compress layers in a scene for a more dramatic effect, or capture architectural details without having to change lenses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
However, there is one important exception: astrophotography. If your travels involve shooting the Milky Way or starry skies, the 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is vastly superior. That extra stop of light is critical for capturing clean, detailed stars without excessively high ISOs.<\/p>\nVerdict:<\/strong> The 24-105mm f\/4 is the better choice for most travel and landscape work due to its versatility, reach, and lower weight. Only consider the f\/2.8 if night sky photography is a primary focus.<\/p>\nPour le vid\u00e9aste<\/h3>\n
Les deux objectifs sont de s\u00e9rieux pr\u00e9tendants pour la vid\u00e9o, gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 leurs ouvertures maximales constantes. Cette caract\u00e9ristique cruciale signifie que vous pouvez zoomer ou d\u00e9zoomer pendant une prise de vue sans que l'exposition ne change, une caract\u00e9ristique des objectifs vid\u00e9o professionnels. La d\u00e9cision d\u00e9pend encore une fois de vos besoins sp\u00e9cifiques.<\/p>\n
The 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is the go-to for cinematic low-light scenes, interviews in dimly lit rooms, and documentary work where you can’t control the lighting. The ability to create a very shallow depth of field is also a powerful storytelling tool in video, guiding the viewer’s focus. High-end f\/2.8 models also tend to have better control over focus breathing (the subtle shift in framing as focus is adjusted), which is critical for professional focus pulls.<\/p>\nThe 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong> is a fantastic all-in-one “run-and-gun” lens for vlogging, travel documentaries, and corporate videos shot in well-lit environments. Its greater zoom range offers more framing flexibility without needing a lens swap, which is ideal for solo shooters or fast-moving productions.<\/p>\nVerdict:<\/strong> The 24-70mm f\/2.8 for cinematic, low-light work where depth of field is a creative tool. The 24-105mm f\/4 for maximum versatility, travel vlogging, and all-in-one documentary shooting in good light.<\/p>\nPour le passionn\u00e9 et le photographe de tous les jours<\/h3>\n
For the enthusiast photographer who captures a wide variety of subjects\u2014from family gatherings and kids’ sports to vacation landscapes and street scenes\u2014the 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong> presents an almost unbeatable combination of value and versatility.<\/p>\nIt acts as a true “one-lens solution,” covering the vast majority of photographic situations you’re likely to encounter. Its lower cost makes it a much more accessible entry point into professional-grade optics, and its lighter weight means you’re more likely to have it with you to capture life’s moments. The image quality is still superb and a massive step up from any kit lens.<\/p>\n
So, when should a hobbyist invest in the 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong>? You should consider the upgrade if you find yourself consistently frustrated by two specific limitations:<\/p>\n\n- Vous photographiez fr\u00e9quemment en int\u00e9rieur sans flash (par exemple, pi\u00e8ces de th\u00e9\u00e2tre scolaires, mus\u00e9es, \u00e9v\u00e9nements familiaux \u00e0 la maison) et vos photos sont souvent floues ou bruit\u00e9es.<\/li>\n
- Vous \u00eates passionn\u00e9 par le portrait et constatez que vous n'arrivez pas \u00e0 obtenir le niveau de flou d'arri\u00e8re-plan et de s\u00e9paration du sujet que vous d\u00e9sirez avec votre \u00e9quipement actuel.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Verdict:<\/strong> Start with the 24-105mm f\/4. It’s the more practical, affordable, and versatile choice for everyday photography. Only upgrade to the 24-70mm f\/2.8 if you have a specific and persistent need for its low-light or creative aperture capabilities.<\/p>\nVerdict final : Un r\u00e9sum\u00e9 pour votre sac photo<\/h2>\n
After weighing the technical specifications, practical handling, and ideal use cases, the choice between a 24-70mm f\/2.8 and a 24-105mm f\/4 becomes less about which lens is definitively superior and more about which lens aligns with your personal photography goals. To help you make the final decision, let’s summarize the ideal user for each lens.<\/p>\n
Profil d'un utilisateur de 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/h3>\n
Cet objectif est probablement le bon choix pour vous si votre photographie se d\u00e9finit par un besoin de capacit\u00e9 maximale de collecte de lumi\u00e8re et de contr\u00f4le cr\u00e9atif sur la profondeur de champ. Vous pourriez \u00eatre un utilisateur de 24-70mm f\/2.8 si :<\/p>\n
\n- Vous vous identifiez comme un professionnel en activit\u00e9 ou un passionn\u00e9 profond\u00e9ment engag\u00e9 qui exige une qualit\u00e9 d'image sans compromis.<\/li>\n
Votre travail vous place fr\u00e9quemment dans des environnements difficiles et faiblement \u00e9clair\u00e9s, tels que les r\u00e9ceptions de mariage, les \u00e9v\u00e9nements en int\u00e9rieur ou les salles de concert, o\u00f9 chaque photon compte.<\/p><\/li>\n
- Cr\u00e9er une faible profondeur de champ pour un isolement significatif du sujet et un bokeh doux et agr\u00e9able est une pierre angulaire de votre style artistique.<\/li>\n
- Vous \u00eates pr\u00eat \u00e0 accepter les compromis d'une construction plus lourde et d'un prix plus \u00e9lev\u00e9 en \u00e9change de performances optiques optimales et de ce diaphragme suppl\u00e9mentaire.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Profil d'un utilisateur de 24-105mm f\/4<\/h3>\n
Ce objectif<\/b> est votre compagnon id\u00e9al si vos priorit\u00e9s penchent vers la flexibilit\u00e9, la commodit\u00e9 et une solution tout-en-un sans sacrifier la qualit\u00e9 de niveau professionnel. Le 24-105mm f\/4 est probablement fait pour vous si :<\/p>\n\n- Vous privil\u00e9giez une configuration polyvalente \u00e0 objectif unique et un sac photo plus l\u00e9ger, valorisant une plus grande port\u00e9e par rapport \u00e0 une ouverture maximale plus large.<\/li>\n
- Vous \u00eates principalement un photographe de voyage, de paysage ou de lumi\u00e8re du jour en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral qui utilise g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement des ouvertures plus petites comme f\/5.6 ou f\/8.<\/li>\n
- Une grande partie de votre travail s'effectue dans un environnement de studio o\u00f9 vous avez un contr\u00f4le total sur l'\u00e9clairage, ce qui rend une grande ouverture moins critique.<\/li>\n
- Vous travaillez avec un budget plus restreint mais vous avez toujours besoin de la construction robuste, de l'\u00e9tanch\u00e9it\u00e9 aux intemp\u00e9ries et de l'excellente qualit\u00e9 d'image d'un objectif zoom de qualit\u00e9 professionnelle.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Ultimately, the debate has no universal winner. The 24-70 mm f\/2,8<\/strong> is a master of light and depth, a specialist tool for those who need the best in demanding situations. The 24-105mm f\/4<\/strong> is a master of versatility, a reliable jack-of-all-trades that offers incredible flexibility for a wider range of scenarios. There is no single “best” lens\u2014only the best lens for your specific needs, your style, and the stories you want to tell.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"D\u00e9couvrez les principales diff\u00e9rences entre l'objectif 24-70 mm f\/2,8 et l'objectif 24-105 mm f\/4 afin de d\u00e9terminer celui qui r\u00e9pond le mieux \u00e0 vos besoins photographiques.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":236176,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"24-70mm f\/2.8 vs 24-105mm f\/4 : Which one is the best ?","_seopress_titles_desc":"Explore the key differences between the 24-70mm f\/2.8 and the 24-105mm f\/4 lenses to find out which best suits your photography needs.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[533,366,592,508],"collection":[],"level":[],"photo-topic":[26173],"class_list":["post-101085","photography-guide","type-photography-guide","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-aperture","tag-gear","tag-lenses","tag-travel-photography","photo-topic-gear"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/photography-guide\/101085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/photography-guide"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/photography-guide"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/photography-guide\/101085\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/236176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101085"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=101085"},{"taxonomy":"level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level?post=101085"},{"taxonomy":"photo-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/photo-topic?post=101085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}