Long before the first European ships reached its shores, the land now known as Colombia was a mosaic of vibrant and complex societies. Far from being an untamed wilderness, this territory was home to diverse peoples who developed sophisticated political systems, extensive trade networks, and extraordinary artistic traditions. These early civilizations harnessed the region’s challenging geography, from the high Andean plateaus to the humid Caribbean lowlands, creating a rich cultural tapestry that laid the foundation for Colombia’s history.<\/p>\n
Among the many groups that flourished, several stand out for their scale and influence. In the cool, fertile highlands of the central Andes, the Muisca Confederation<\/strong> governed the region around modern-day Bogot\u00e1. They were not a unified empire but a loose alliance of chiefdoms, renowned for their mastery of agriculture, salt mining, and weaving. In the steep, isolated mountains of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, the Tairona<\/strong> people built remarkable stone cities, including the terraced marvel now known as the Cit\u00e9 Perdue<\/strong> (Lost City). Their advanced engineering, evident in their roads and irrigation systems, allowed them to thrive in the demanding mountain environment.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, in the temperate Cauca River valley, the Quimbaya<\/strong> civilization became celebrated for its exceptional metallurgy. Further north, in the floodplains of the Sin\u00fa and San Jorge rivers, the Zen\u00fa<\/strong> culture engineered a massive system of canals and artificial mounds spanning hundreds of thousands of acres to manage seasonal floods and sustain their communities. Other groups, such as the Calima<\/strong> cultures in the western cordillera, also contributed to this pre-Columbian legacy with their own distinct ceramic and goldsmithing styles.<\/p>\n These civilizations were underpinned by advanced agricultural practices tailored to their unique environments, from the Muisca’s cultivation of potatoes and maize in the highlands to the Zen\u00fa’s sophisticated hydraulic systems in the lowlands. They were interconnected by extensive trade networks that moved goods like coastal salt, highland emeralds, and Amazonian feathers across the diverse landscape. Their societies were often hierarchical, led by chiefs, or caciques<\/em>, who held both political and spiritual authority, supported by a class of priests and warriors.<\/p>\n It was from a Muisca ceremony that the enduring Legend of El Dorado<\/strong> was born. This was not a city of gold, but a ritual in which a new Muisca chief, covered in gold dust, would sail to the center of Lake Guatavita and offer precious gold artifacts and emeralds to the gods. For the Muisca, it was a profound act of spiritual renewal. For the Spanish conquistadors who later heard the tale, it became a feverish obsession, fueling a relentless and destructive search for mythical treasures.<\/p>\n The goldwork of these cultures, particularly the Quimbaya and Tairona, represents one of the pinnacles of pre-Columbian art. However, it is crucial to understand that the value of gold was not monetary but spiritual. Its radiant, incorruptible shine was associated with the sun god and divine energy. Craftsmen mastered techniques like lost-wax casting to create intricate objects\u2014pectorals, funerary masks, and votive figures known as tunjos<\/em>\u2014that served as offerings to the gods or as symbols of the wearer’s sacred authority and connection to the cosmos. These pieces were not currency; they were tangible expressions of power, belief, and the sacred order of the universe.<\/p>\n The dawn of the 16th century marked an irrevocable turning point in the history of the land now known as Colombia. The arrival of Spanish ships on its Caribbean coast heralded the end of the pre-Columbian world and the beginning of a long, complex, and often brutal colonial period that would reshape the continent’s social, political, and cultural landscape forever.<\/p>\n The first European eyes to gaze upon the Colombian coast belonged to the crew of Rodrigo de Bastidas<\/strong>, who explored the area around the Magdalena River delta in 1501. Over the next few decades, the Spanish established coastal strongholds like Santa Marta (1525) and Cartagena (1533), using them as launching pads for expeditions into the mysterious and rumored-to-be-wealthy interior. The allure of gold, fueled by the legend of El Dorado, drove these men deep into unforgiving jungles and over formidable mountain ranges.<\/p>\n The most consequential of these expeditions was led by Gonzalo Jim\u00e9nez de Quesada<\/strong>. In 1536, he led a grueling journey up the Magdalena River, battling disease, starvation, and hostile territory. After immense hardship, his depleted force reached the high Andean plateau, the home of the Muisca Confederation. Overwhelming the indigenous leadership through a combination of force and strategy, Quesada founded the city of Santa Fe de Bogot\u00e1<\/strong> on August 6, 1538, establishing a Spanish capital in the heart of the newly conquered territory.<\/p>\n La conqu\u00eate fut un \u00e9v\u00e9nement violent et catastrophique pour les peuples autochtones. L'acier, les chevaux et les armes \u00e0 feu espagnols offrirent un avantage militaire consid\u00e9rable, mais ce furent les maladies europ\u00e9ennes comme la variole et la rougeole, auxquelles les populations autochtones n'avaient aucune immunit\u00e9, qui se r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e8rent les plus d\u00e9vastatrices. La subjugation de civilisations sophistiqu\u00e9es comme les Muisca et les Tairona fut rapide et impitoyable, entra\u00eenant l'effondrement de leurs structures sociales et un d\u00e9clin drastique de leurs populations.<\/p>\n With conquest came colonization. The Spanish Crown sought to impose order and extract wealth from its new territories, establishing the Vice-royaut\u00e9 de Nouvelle-Grenade<\/strong> in 1717 to centralize administrative control over what is now Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, and Venezuela. Life under Spanish rule was rigidly hierarchical and exploitative, designed to benefit the monarchy and a colonial elite.<\/p>\n A key institution of this exploitation was the Encomienda system<\/strong>. In theory, it was a grant from the Crown that gave a Spanish encomendero the right to demand tribute and forced labor from the indigenous inhabitants of an area. In practice, it was a system of near-slavery that subjected native communities to brutal working conditions, particularly in mines and on large estates, contributing further to their demographic collapse.<\/p>\n The colonial economy was fundamentally extractive. The primary focus was on mining vast quantities of gold and the world’s finest emeralds, which were shipped back to Spain to finance its European wars and imperial ambitions. Agriculture was organized around large haciendas that produced food for the colonies and cash crops for export, often on land seized from indigenous communities.<\/p>\n The \u00c9glise catholique<\/strong> was an inseparable partner of the state in the colonial project. Missionaries worked to convert indigenous populations to Christianity, a process that often involved the destruction of native religious sites and the suppression of traditional beliefs. The Church controlled education, social welfare, and vast tracts of land, becoming a powerful and wealthy institution that shaped every aspect of colonial life and culture.<\/p>\n As the indigenous workforce perished, the Spanish began importing enslaved Africans to labor in the gold mines of the Choc\u00f3 and Antioquia regions and on the sugar cane plantations of the Caribbean coast. This forced migration added another layer to the colony’s social fabric, leading to the development of a rigid caste system (sistema de castas)<\/strong>. An individual’s social standing, rights, and opportunities were determined by their racial ancestry, with Spanish-born Peninsulares at the top, followed by American-born Creoles, mixed-race Mestizos and Mulattos, and with indigenous peoples and enslaved Africans at the bottom of the hierarchy.<\/p>\n By the late 18th century, the intellectual currents of the European Enlightenment had crossed the Atlantic, carrying with them radical ideas of liberty, popular sovereignty, and individual rights. These concepts resonated deeply with the criollo<\/em> elite of New Granada\u2014people of Spanish descent born in the Americas\u2014who were growing weary of their secondary status to Spanish-born officials. The success of the American and French Revolutions provided a tangible blueprint for change, proving that colonial rule could be overthrown and new republics established.<\/p>\n Early tremors of discontent were felt long before the final break. The Comunero Revolt of 1781<\/strong> stands as a powerful early example. Sparked by oppressive tax hikes, a diverse coalition of peasants, merchants, and indigenous people marched on Bogot\u00e1 to demand economic and administrative reforms. While the rebellion was ultimately suppressed and its leaders executed, it exposed the deep-seated grievances within the colony and demonstrated the potential for mass mobilization against Spanish authority.<\/p>\n The decisive catalyst, however, came from Europe. In 1808, Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Spain and deposed King Ferdinand VII, creating a massive power vacuum throughout the Spanish Empire. With the legitimate monarch imprisoned, criollo leaders in New Granada argued that sovereignty should revert to the people. They began forming local governing councils, or juntas<\/em>, initially in the name of the deposed king, but these bodies quickly became the engines of a full-fledged independence movement.<\/p>\n The pivotal moment arrived on July 20, 1810<\/strong>, in Santa Fe de Bogot\u00e1. In a carefully orchestrated event, criollo patriots provoked a public dispute with a Spanish merchant over the borrowing of a flower vase, igniting a popular uprising. This event, known as the Cry of Independence (Grito de Independencia)<\/strong>, led to the formation of the first independent governing council and is celebrated today as Colombia’s Independence Day. It marked the beginning of a long and brutal war against Spanish loyalists.<\/p>\n The struggle for freedom was defined by two monumental figures whose visions for the new nation would shape its destiny. Sim\u00f3n Bol\u00edvar<\/strong>, known as “El Libertador,” was the brilliant military strategist and charismatic visionary who led the patriot armies across the continent. His counterpart was Francisco de Paula Santander<\/strong>, a meticulous organizer and statesman known as “The Man of Laws,” who focused on building the legal and institutional framework for a stable republic. Their complementary skills were crucial to the war effort, though their ideological differences would later lead to conflict.<\/p>\n After years of fierce fighting, the tide turned decisively on August 7, 1819, at the Battle of Boyac\u00e1<\/strong>. In a brilliant and daring military campaign, Bol\u00edvar led his army over the treacherous Andes mountains to surprise and defeat the royalist forces. This victory shattered Spanish control over New Granada, secured the liberation of Bogot\u00e1, and is considered the crowning achievement of the independence campaign.<\/p>\n With independence secured, Bol\u00edvar pursued his grandest ambition: the creation of a single, powerful South American republic. In 1819, the Congress of Angostura proclaimed the formation of the Republic of Colombia, a massive state uniting the territories of present-day Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Panama<\/strong>. This federation, known to historians as Gran Colombia, was intended to be a beacon of stability and strength in the New World.<\/p>\n However, the dream was short-lived. The new republic was beset by profound challenges from its inception. Vast distances and rugged geography made communication and governance nearly impossible. Deep economic disparities and fierce regional loyalties bred resentment, particularly in Venezuela and Ecuador, which felt marginalized by the central government in Bogot\u00e1. The most significant rift was political, pitting Bol\u00edvar’s desire for a strong, centralized presidency against Santander’s advocacy for a federalist system with greater regional autonomy. These irreconcilable tensions proved fatal, and by 1831, both Venezuela and Ecuador had seceded. The grand union dissolved, and the central territory was reorganized as the Republic of New Granada, the direct predecessor of modern Colombia.<\/p>\n The dissolution of Gran Colombia in 1831 did not bring stability. Instead, it plunged the newly independent Republic of New Granada (as Colombia was then known) into a profound identity crisis. The core of the nation’s political turmoil was a fundamental ideological clash over how the country should be governed. On one side were the Centralists<\/strong>, who argued for a strong, centralized government headquartered in Bogot\u00e1 to maintain order and national unity. On the other were the Federalists<\/strong>, who championed regional autonomy and feared that a powerful central state would stifle local interests and freedoms.<\/p>\n This deep-seated disagreement soon coalesced into the two political parties that would dominate Colombian life for more than a century. The Centralist faction evolved into the Conservative Party<\/strong>, generally aligned with the Catholic Church, protectionist economic policies, and the preservation of a hierarchical social order. The Federalists formed the core of the Liberal Party<\/strong>, which advocated for the separation of church and state, free trade, and broader individual liberties. This political schism was not merely a parliamentary debate; it became the defining fault line in Colombian society, setting the stage for decades of conflict.<\/p>\n The 19th century in Colombia is often characterized by a recurring and brutal pattern of civil war. The deep ideological chasm between the Conservative and Liberal parties proved irreconcilable, leading to at least eight major national civil wars and dozens of smaller regional insurrections. Power frequently changed hands not through the ballot box, but through armed conflict. Each war deepened the animosity between the two sides, creating a cycle of violence, retribution, and political instability that crippled the nation’s development and entrenched a culture of political intolerance.<\/p>\n This era of strife culminated in the most devastating conflict of all: the Thousand Days’ War (1899-1902)<\/strong>. Sparked by a Liberal revolt against an increasingly authoritarian Conservative government and exacerbated by an economic crisis linked to falling coffee prices, the war engulfed the entire country. It was a brutal, all-encompassing conflict that pitted neighbor against neighbor and left an estimated 100,000 people dead. The war’s end left Colombia economically shattered, politically exhausted, and psychologically scarred, creating a vulnerable state on the cusp of a new century.<\/p>\n In the immediate aftermath of the Thousand Days’ War, a weakened and divided Colombia faced its most profound territorial loss. The Isthmus of Panama, though part of Colombia since independence, had always maintained a distinct identity and a history of separatist movements, owing to its geographic isolation from the country’s Andean core. This long-standing desire for autonomy found a powerful ally in the geopolitical ambitions of the United States.<\/p>\n The United States, under President Theodore Roosevelt, was determined to build a canal across the isthmus after a French attempt had failed. When the Colombian Senate rejected the Hay-Herr\u00e1n Treaty in 1903, which would have granted the U.S. control over the proposed canal zone, Washington shifted its strategy. The U.S. government provided tacit and material support to Panamanian separatists, and when the rebellion began, an American warship, the USS Nashville, physically blocked Colombian troops from landing to suppress it. With its path cleared by American might, Panama declared independence on November 3, 1903. For Colombia, the swift and irreversible loss of Panama was a national humiliation that poisoned its relationship with the United States for decades and marked a bitter end to a century defined by internal division and external vulnerability.<\/p>\n The fragile peace of the early 20th century was shattered on April 9, 1948, with the assassination of the charismatic populist and Liberal presidential candidate, Jorge Eli\u00e9cer Gait\u00e1n<\/strong>. His murder in broad daylight in Bogot\u00e1 ignited immediate and widespread rioting known as El Bogotazo<\/strong>, which leveled much of the capital’s center and served as the explosive catalyst for a brutal, decade-long undeclared civil war. This period, known simply and starkly as La Violencia<\/strong>, pitted supporters of the Liberal and Conservative parties against each other, particularly in rural areas. It was a conflict characterized by extreme partisanship, local vendettas, and unimaginable cruelty, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 200,000 people and the forced displacement of millions, profoundly scarring the national psyche and redrawing the country’s social landscape.<\/p>\n In an effort to end the bloodshed of La Violencia, the leaders of the Liberal and Conservative parties brokered a unique power-sharing agreement in 1958. The Front national<\/strong> (Frente Nacional) established a system where the two parties would alternate the presidency for 16 years and share power equally in all government institutions. While the pact successfully halted the inter-party violence, it had a critical and unforeseen consequence. By creating a closed two-party political system, it effectively disenfranchised and excluded all other political movements, particularly those on the left. This political exclusion created fertile ground for radical ideologies, leading disillusioned students, intellectuals, and peasant farmers to take up arms. It was during this period that the major left-wing guerrilla movements were born, including the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC<\/strong>) and the National Liberation Army (ELN<\/strong>), setting the stage for a new, more ideological armed conflict.<\/p>\n Beginning in the 1970s, a new and corrosive force emerged: the industrial-scale trafficking of cocaine. The immense profits gave rise to powerful and ruthless drug cartels, most notoriously the Medell\u00edn Cartel<\/strong>, led by Pablo Escobar, and its rival, the Cali Cartel. In the 1980s, Escobar declared a war on the Colombian state, seeking to prevent his extradition to the United States. This dark chapter was defined by a wave of narcoterrorism that included car bombings, assassinations of presidential candidates, judges, and journalists, and the bombing of a commercial airliner. It was a period of profound fear and instability. Yet, in the face of this onslaught, Colombian society demonstrated extraordinary resilience. Brave journalists continued to report, honest judges refused to be intimidated, and state institutions, though battered, never collapsed. The fight against the cartels was a testament to the courage of countless Colombians who risked everything to prevent their nation from succumbing to the rule of criminals.<\/p>\n By the 1990s, the conflict had morphed into a complex and devastating three-way war. The state found itself fighting not only the entrenched guerrilla movements but also a new and brutal actor: right-wing paramilitary groups. These groups, often coalesced under the banner of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC<\/strong>), were initially formed by landowners and business interests, sometimes with tacit support from elements within the state, to combat guerrilla expansion. However, they soon became deeply involved in the drug trade and carried out some of the conflict’s worst atrocities. This multifaceted war plunged the country into a severe humanitarian crisis. Kidnapping became a common tactic for financing and political leverage, while massacres and targeted killings terrorized rural communities. The fighting fueled one of the world’s largest internal displacement crises, as millions of Colombians were forced to flee their homes to escape the crossfire.<\/p>\n The dawn of the 21st century marked a profound turning point for Colombia, beginning with a foundational legal and social shift. The Constitution of 1991<\/strong> was more than a new legal document; it was a new social contract. Replacing a century-old constitution, it redefined the nation as a pluralistic and multicultural society, formally recognizing the rights and territories of its indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities. This progressive charter enshrined fundamental human rights, created mechanisms for citizen protection, and laid the groundwork for a more inclusive and democratic state.<\/p>\n Forts de cette nouvelle base, les efforts de l'\u00c9tat se sont intensifi\u00e9s contre les divers groupes arm\u00e9s ill\u00e9gaux qui d\u00e9stabilisaient le pays. Le pouvoir des grands cartels de la drogue ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 bris\u00e9 \u00e0 la fin des ann\u00e9es 1990, le gouvernement s'est concentr\u00e9 sur la reconqu\u00eate du contr\u00f4le territorial face aux forces gu\u00e9rilleras et paramilitaires. Une strat\u00e9gie soutenue et multidimensionnelle, combinant pression militaire et investissement social, a commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 donner des r\u00e9sultats tangibles, r\u00e9tablissant progressivement une pr\u00e9sence de l'\u00c9tat dans des r\u00e9gions longtemps abandonn\u00e9es aux dynamiques du conflit.<\/p>\n By the early 2000s, these efforts translated into significant improvements in security across much of the country. Major highways that were once impassable became safe for travel, kidnapping rates plummeted, and cities like Medell\u00edn and Bogot\u00e1 underwent remarkable urban transformations. For the first time in a generation, Colombians began to travel freely within their own borders, rediscovering a country of immense beauty and diversity. This newfound stability was the essential precursor to the social and economic renaissance that would follow.<\/p>\n The most significant step in Colombia’s transformation was the pursuit of a negotiated end to its longest-running conflict. After years of complex negotiations, the Colombian government and the FARC<\/strong> (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia) guerrilla group signed a historic Peace Accord in 2016<\/strong>. This agreement sought to end more than five decades of war by facilitating the FARC’s disarmament and transformation into a political party. The accord was comprehensive, addressing deep-rooted issues such as rural reform, political participation for opposition movements, and justice for the conflict’s millions of victims.<\/p>\n The implementation of the peace accord has been a monumental and challenging task. It involves the difficult process of reintegrating thousands of former combatants into civilian life, a process fraught with social and economic hurdles. Furthermore, fulfilling the accord’s promises of transitional justice and comprehensive rural development requires immense political will and resources. Lingering violence in some regions, often linked to new armed groups vying for control of illicit economies, underscores the fragility and complexity of building a lasting peace.<\/p>\n The 2016 agreement was not the final chapter. Recognizing that other conflicts persist, subsequent governments have pursued a policy of “Paz Total”<\/strong> (Total Peace), aiming to engage in dialogue and negotiation with the remaining armed groups, such as the ELN (Ej\u00e9rcito de Liberaci\u00f3n Nacional). This ongoing effort highlights a national commitment to resolving conflict through dialogue, acknowledging that a complete and stable peace requires the participation of all actors.<\/p>\n Freed from the worst of its past conflicts, Colombia has blossomed into a nation of dynamism and opportunity. Its economy has grown and diversified, attracting significant foreign investment in sectors ranging from technology and finance to sustainable agriculture. Cities once known for violence are now celebrated as hubs of innovation, with Medell\u00edn, in particular, earning global recognition for its social urbanism and technological advancement. Our Bogot\u00e1 travel guide<\/a> can help you explore another of Colombia’s vibrant cities.<\/p>\n Culturally, Colombia has emerged as a global powerhouse. The rhythms of cumbia<\/strong> et vallenato<\/strong> provide a soundtrack to the nation’s identity, while contemporary Colombian musicians top international charts. Its literary tradition, famously represented by Gabriel Garc\u00eda M\u00e1rquez, continues to thrive with a new generation of acclaimed writers and poets. The country’s vibrant art scene, rich film industry, and world-class cuisine are further testaments to a creative spirit that was never extinguished. You can experience some of this vibrant culture in towns like Mompox<\/a>, a UNESCO World Heritage site.<\/p>\n Perhaps the most visible sign of Colombia’s transformation is the boom in tourism. International travelers are flocking to explore its snow-capped Andean peaks, lush Amazon rainforest, sun-drenched Caribbean coasts, and vibrant, historic cities. The global perception has shifted dramatically\u2014from a place of caution to one of fascination. Today, Colombia stands as a testament to resilience. It is a country that has confronted its painful history with courage and is now defining itself not by the shadows of its past, but by the vibrancy of its culture, the warmth of its people, and an unwavering, optimistic gaze toward a peaceful and prosperous future.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Explore Colombia’s journey from ancient civilizations to modern vibrancy.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":46610,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"History of Colombia","_seopress_titles_desc":"Explore Colombia's journey from ancient civilizations to modern vibrancy.","_seopress_robots_index":""},"tags":[452,22,496,493,556,26613,26022],"article-type":[24796],"collection":[27469,27148],"continent":[24758],"country":[11],"class_list":["post-44834","travel-guide","type-travel-guide","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-colombia","tag-culture","tag-geography","tag-history","tag-latin-america","tag-politics","tag-south-america","article-type-culture","collection-colombia-birdwatching-tour","collection-colombia-photo-tour-roadbooks","continent-south-america","country-colombia"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/travel-guide\/44834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/travel-guide"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/travel-guide"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46610"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44834"},{"taxonomy":"article-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-type?post=44834"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=44834"},{"taxonomy":"continent","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/continent?post=44834"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-expeditions.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=44834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Soci\u00e9t\u00e9, Culture et Artisanat<\/h3>\n
La conqu\u00eate espagnole et l'\u00e8re coloniale<\/h2>\n
Arriv\u00e9e des conquistadors<\/h3>\n
Vie sous la domination espagnole<\/h3>\n
Le Chemin vers l'Ind\u00e9pendance et la Grande Colombie<\/h2>\n
Graines de la R\u00e9volution<\/h3>\n
Les Guerres d'Ind\u00e9pendance<\/h3>\n
Le r\u00eave de la Grande Colombie<\/h3>\n
Le tumultueux 19e si\u00e8cle : guerres civiles et division<\/h2>\n
La naissance d'une nation divis\u00e9e<\/h3>\n
Un si\u00e8cle de conflit<\/h3>\n
La perte du Panama<\/h3>\n
Le 20e si\u00e8cle : Violence, Cartels et Conflits<\/h2>\n
La Violencia (La Violence)<\/h3>\n
Le Front National et la mont\u00e9e des gu\u00e9rillas<\/h3>\n
L'\u00c8re du Narco-Terrorisme<\/h3>\n
L'escalade des conflits arm\u00e9s<\/h3>\n
Une Nation R\u00e9invent\u00e9e : La Colombie au 21e Si\u00e8cle<\/h2>\n
Changer la donne<\/h3>\n
Le Chemin vers la Paix<\/h3>\n
Colombie aujourd'hui : une renaissance culturelle et \u00e9conomique<\/h3>\n